Seenapse

Aquí esta una  aplicación llamada Seenapse, creada por el  publicista Rafael Jimenez y pensada principalmente en ser una herramienta para creativos. Es una suerte de nueva red social basada en conexiones de ideas y asociaciones mentales. No es dificl ver el potencial de esto, dado lo importante que es hoy en dia la creatvidad -como búsqueda de nuevas ideas- y la información bien organizada…

Seenapse is a new platform designed to help inspire new, non-obvious combinations.

As I may have mentioned before, I believe ideas are a certain kind of thing.

I think that Genius Steals, that ideas are new combinations, that originality is a myth, and that the best, most interesting, most attention earning ideas, exist at the very fringes.

The least obvious combinations that still solves the problem is more effective, because it is less obvious, therefore more interesting. More creative, if you will.  Our abillity to create associations between seemingly non-related ideas is a fundamental aspect of how brains work.

It’s what makes metaphors powerful and why metaphors are so important to how we think, seeing non-obvious similarity in different things…

http://bit.ly/1lnjj20

Seenapse

Shakespeare & Wormholes

Con la novedad de que el término científico “wormhole” (agujero de gusano en español), también conocido como “puente Einstein-Rosen” no nació de ningún ámbito científico, sino del siguiente texto en un poema del mismísimo W. Shakespeare (“The Rape of Lucrece”, 1594)

“To fill with worm-holes stately monuments, 
To feed oblivion with decay of things, 
To blot old books and alter their contents, 
To pluck the quills from ancient ravens’ wings.”

As science comes up with new concepts it also creates new terms to describe them. But sometimes, the term they’re looking for already exists. Here’s how Shakespeare came up with a term for a theoretical physics concept almost 350 years before it had been invented.

Wormhole may sound like a rather modern coining, but it actually dates back to 1594 when Shakespeare used it in a verse of his poem The Rape of Lucrece (h/t to commenter Guild_Navigator, who reminded us of the verse in the comments of this post, on a mathematician who created his own language)...

http://bit.ly/1hUPQKJ

Shakespeare & Wormholes

La muerte no existe

El científico Robert Lanza, profesor de la Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Wake Forest de Carolina, argumenta que la muerte solo es una idea creada por el cerebro, y que creemos en la muerte porque es lo que “nos han enseñado”, según afirmó para el periódico  Daily Mail.


“Creemos que la vida es solo la actividad del carbono y una mezcla de moléculas; vivimos un tiempo y después nos pudrimos bajo tierra”, afirma. Su teoría es denominada ‘universo de la biocéntrica’, y explica que la muerte no es terminal, como se cree. La vida y la biología originan la realidad y el universo, no sucede a la inversa.

Lanza ejemplificó a través de la percepción: “Una persona ve el cielo azul y le dicen que ese color es el ‘azul’, pero se pueden cambiar las células de su cerebro para que vea el cielo de color verde o rojo”, afirma. Todo lo que puede pasar, afirma el físico, sucede en ‘multiversos’, es decir que la muerte no existiría en un sentido real.

El científico, quien fue uno de los partícipes de los primeros experimentos de clonación, dice que al morir, la vida se convierte en “una flor perenne que vuelve a florecer en el multiverso”. Esto concordaría con el experimento de la doble rendija, que demuestra que la percepción humana participa en el comportamiento de la materia y energía, publicó Publimetro, Chile…

http://bit.ly/I3YQPu

La muerte no existe

Chickens are like steady-cams

Chickens are like nature’s steady-cams. They posses a remarkable ability to keep their heads stable even as their bodies move around. And it all has to do with their eyes.

The anatomic feature is demonstrated to great effect in this newly released Mercedes commercial, which is presumably for some stability feature. The result, as you now know, looks like this:

Pretty cool, right? Chickens – like most birds – lack the eye-control necessary to keep their gaze fixed on a stationary object while the rest of their body is moving. In humans, these compensatory adjustments are handled by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), an involuntary eye-movement that keeps your vision stabilized when you move your head. Lacking the oculomotor control that we humans possess, chickens have evolved to offload these compensatory adjustments to the muscles of the head and neck, instead.

Lots of birds do this. If you’ve ever seen a pigeon bob its head as it walked around, you’ve seen a bird compensate for the movement of its body for the sake of its vision (or, in scientist speak, you’ve seen “an optokinetic response to stabilize the retinal image”). Remember the Rotate Your Owl video? Same thing.

Lots more on oculomotor organization (in humans and birds) herehere, here and here.

[via]

http://bit.ly/18vzHX6

Chickens are like steady-cams

Pangea with borders

Pretty wild, right? It’s a map of Pangea – a supercontinent that formed roughly 300 million years ago – mapped with contemporary geopolitical borders.

What you see here is an anachronistic mashup — a modern map, complete with geological features that did not exist 300-million years ago, with its various parts relocated to the general position they would have occupied before Pangea began rifting apart some 200-million years ago. It’s a view of the supercontinent not often seen, and a mind-bending way of relating to the world on a geological time scale. (hi-res)…

http://bit.ly/15yAdR6

Never go back

Un articulo fascinante de Annalee Newitz para io9.com, sobre el concepto de naturaleza.
Siempre hemos pensado que tenemos un problema: que es el estar atrapados en nuestra propia evolución, que jamás podremos (si quisiéramos o necesitáramos hacerlo) regresar a un estado natural.
Siempre hemos creído que la misma naturaleza es un concepto creado por el hombre. Que es algo cultural -no natural- y que no hay manera de regresar a ella.

Pero ahora, algunas personas creen que nuestro verdadero problema es pensar eso…

One of the arguments that environmentalists use against factory farming and burning fossil fuels is that these activities are “unnatural” or that they go “against nature.” But what exactly is this “nature,” and who gets to define it? The answer is that nature actually comes from culture.

In the west, many of our common sense ideas about nature can be traced back to a debate that brewed between political philosophers in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Their debate, which is by no means settled even to this day, centered on human nature. Are we inherently evil and greedy, or inherently good and altruistic? To answer, philosophers 300 years ago turned to what were then called “savage” peoples, mostly Native Americans, trying to figure out how humans acted in a “state of nature.”

Probably the most famous comment in this debate came from the quill of Thomas Hobbes, who commented sardonically in his masterwork The Leviathan that life in a state of nature was “poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” Others argued that savages were “noble” or “gentlemen” precisely because they lived in harmony with the world around them and weren’t burdened by the strictures of morality and economics…

http://bit.ly/X7HbKy

Never go back

Fiction came true…

Aquí hay otro de esos pocos recuentos anuales que valen la pena: ideas de la ciencia ficción que este año -2012- se volvieron realidad (publicado por mashable.com). Desde vuelos espaciales privados hasta los primeros logros en Tele-portación. Traductores universales en tiempo real. Lentes con realidad  aumentada…

As a longtime reader of science fiction, it’s always interesting to see how the visions of writers eventually become real. Take Arthur C. Clarke’s letter to Wireless World in 1945, which details the geostationary communications satellite network everyone uses today. The satellites are in what is called the “Clarke Orbit.” And Isaac Asimov wrote frequently about humanoid robots, which are becoming more common in research labs — although we have yet to see R. Daneel Olivaw from Asimov’s Robot series.

So inspired by these writers and others, here’s a look at 2012 and the futuristic technologies that are materializing before our eyes.

Bionic Limbs

The term “cyborg” was coined in 1960 by Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline, in an article they wrote for the journal Astronautics. Since then bionic limbs have been a trope in many pieces of fiction -– The Six Million Dollar Man of the 1970s, the Borg of the Star Trek franchise, and even Darth Vader. In 2012 for the first time, a paralyzed woman was able to control a robotic limb and feed herself directly with her brain. Continuing work with primates demonstrated that it’s possible to make the brain-computer interface efficient enough to design more realistic movement into the limbs. The bionic limbs so far don’t look anything like their fictional counterparts, as they are still connected via external electrodes to the skull. But that dream seems to be a lot closer than it was even a decade ago.

Quantum Teleportation and Communication

While it’s not possible — yet — to “beam” an object around as in Star Trek, new records for zapping photons instantly from one place to another were set this year. Quantum teleportation has been done in the lab for some time, but the distances were on the order of a few yards. In 2012 the new record was 89 miles. In addition to teleporting, scientists built the first quantum Internet. It’s only a beginning, but teleporting photons for miles would enable communications that can’t be hacked or eavesdropped. 

Genetic Disease Prevented

Genetic engineering for “better” humans is a theme that’s appeared repeatedly ever since Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World in 1931 — although at that point nobody knew what DNA really was. Later, films such as Gattaca and novels such as Beggars in Spain explore the implications of widely available genetic alterations. In 2012, we saw a proof-of-concept for mitochondrial diseases. About one in 200 people are born with a disorder of the mitochondria, the energy factories of cells. For the first time scientists were able to transfer the nuclear DNA of one human egg cell to another. Two groups independently found a way to transplant nuclei between human egg cells, leaving behind the mitochondrial DNA, which is passed from mother to child. The finding means that mitochondrial disorders could be cured before a child is born. Such techniques won’t cure something like Down’s syndrome, which involved nuclear DNA. But it shows that some manipulation of the human genome is not only possible, but happening.

The Universal Translator

Most of the time when intrepid explorers in fiction meet aliens, they always seem to speak perfect English. Doctor Who’s TARDIS generates a field that allows travelers to be understood, while the crew of the Enterprise never seem to need a dictionary. Kim Stanley Robonson’s Marstrilogy features one, but he didn’t think it would appear until late in the 21st century (the novels were written in the 1990s). While they won’t let you talk to aliens, in the last year several speech-to-speech translators have managed to reach real consumer devices — and even one type that uses your own voice. Most of the apps require an internet connection, though some, such as Jibbigo, can store their dictionaries locally. (If they ever add Klingon I’m taking it to the next ComicCon).

Head-mounted Computer Glasses

Readers of Charles Stross’ novel Accelerando would have eagerly anticipated Google Glasses — the Internet giant’s foray into augmented reality. In the novel, “venture altruist” Manfred Macx carries his data and his memories in a pair of glasses connected to the Internet. Google Glasses allow the wearer to access data, the Internet and capture life via a head-mounted digital camera. Memories will have to wait.

Private Space Flight

In many science fiction stories, space travel is private. In Ridley’s Scott latest movie,Prometheus, the Weyland Corporation funds an expedition to follow a star map to the distant moon LV-223. In real life, Elon Musk’s SpaceX launched the first of a dozen planned missions to the International Space Station. The Dragon capsule is designed to resupply the ISS, but Musk, who made his fortune as founder of PayPal, has bigger plans: a colony on Mars. Is 2013 going to be the year human spaceflight becomes an enterprise like railroads? We won’t know that for a while, but SpaceX is a heck of a start.

This list isn’t comprehensive, and it isn’t meant to be the last word on anything; readers, if you think there’s something I missed, please sound off in the comments…

http://on.mash.to/XGYpAt

Fiction came true…

Rousseau y Facebook

De repente es bueno recordar las diferente definiciones de lo que puede entenderse como “bueno” o “verdadero”. Va un poco de Filosofía para una época de auto-complacencias y deshonestidades…

When someone reads the opening words of The Social Contract, for example, namely that Man is born free and everywhere is in chains, does he think, “Gosh, that is true, I never thought of that before!” or does he think, “I wish I were free of all the irritating restraints on my behaviour that prevent me from doing exactly as I choose”?

Rousseau was so contradictory that what we take from him depends almost as much on us as on him. He is a kind of lightning conductor for our desires. Democrats see in his concept of “the general will” the notion of popular sovereignty; aspiring dictators see in it something they believe that they embody, a semi-mystical entity that is independent of any individual’s will, much less that of the numerical majority, and of which he is merely the inspired mouthpiece, as it were.

Rousseau was genuinely revolutionary in the way in which he overturned the notion of Original Sin. For most thinkers before him the question was how Man was to be made good, given his bad or imperfect nature; for Rousseau the question was how Man became bad, given his natural goodness (his answer was society). He did not believe in a return to Nature, exactly, but sought the political means to restore Man to his natural goodness. Personally, I think Rousseau was disastrously mistaken in this; in my opinion, the limitation of the bad in Man is infinitely more important and less sinister politically than the search for the good. When you have limited the bad, the good can take care of itself.

Rousseau was also the unwitting founder of the psychology of the Real Me, that is to say of the inner core of each of us that remains immaculate and without sin, however the external person actually behaves. The inner core, the Real Me, is good; what might be called the Epiphenomenal Me, that is to say the one that loses his temper, tells lies, eats too much, etc, is the result of external influences upon him. In this way a monster of depravity may preserve a high opinion of himself and continue his depravity; nothing he can do can deprive him of the natural goodness first espied by Rousseau.

Jean-Jacques was also, in his way, the philosophical progenitor of Facebook, of the notion that we should live our lives in the open, hiding nothing, for concealment is both the symptom and the cause of insincerity, which was one of J-J’s bugbears. He begins his Confessions in a self-congratulatory way: “Here is the only portrait of a man, painted exactly after nature and in all her truth, that exists and probably ever will exist.” The portrait is extremely interesting because Rousseau, whatever his faults, was an extremely interesting man. Who would not be amused by Rousseau’s account of how he became aware as a child of the sexual pleasure to be had by being beaten by a woman? He continues: “To be at the knees of an imperious mistress, to obey her orders, to have to ask her pardon, was for me a very sweet pleasure…”

http://soc.li/IW1FBpI 

Rousseau y Facebook

32 Innovations

No todos los grandes inventos son bien recibidos inmediatamente. Algunos tardan mucho en ser aceptados. Algunos compiten con otras tecnologías o contra la opinión de la misma gente. Algunos simplementemente nunca llegan a popularizarse, a pesar de ser totalmente innovadores.

En este artículo se mencionan algunas tecnologías que, además de ser inventos relativamente recientes, están siendo aceptados, aplicados y bien asimilados con rapidez, por lo podemos decir con bastente certeza que pronto formarán parte de nuestra vida diaria…

We tend to rewrite the histories of technological innovation, making myths about a guy who had a great idea that changed the world. In reality, though, innovation isn’t the goal; it’s everything that gets you there. It’s bad financial decisions and blueprints for machines that weren’t built until decades later. It’s the important leaps forward that synthesize lots of ideas, and it’s the belly-up failures that teach us what not to do.

When we ignore how innovation actually works, we make it hard to see what’s happening right in front of us today. If you don’t know that the incandescent light was a failure before it was a success, it’s easy to write off some modern energy innovations — like solar panels — because they haven’t hit the big time fast enough…

http://nyti.ms/K5ZYlx

32 Innovations